THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF FIDUCIARY RELATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51989/NUL.2024.1.5

Keywords:

fiduciary relations, recodification of civil law of Ukraine, theories of fiduciary law, fiduciary duties, abuse of right, Coase theorem, transaction costs.

Abstract

The problem with fiduciary legal relations is that it is a complex legal construct with respect to which there are still no unified approaches to its understanding. In common law countries, several areas of application for fiduciary relationships have historically developed, such as trust law, corporate law, agency relationships, relationships between doctor and patient, lawyer and client, guardian and ward, etc. These areas of application of fiduciary relations are so diverse that legal scholars continue to work on finding common features that would unite them and develop a unified theory of fiduciary law. The relevance of studying this legal phenomenon is practical in the context of the recodification of Ukraine's civil legislation and the normative regulation of fiduciary responsibility. The purpose of this research is to study the legal nature of fiduciary relations through the analysis of the theories of their origin. Both theories based on one or several characteristics of fiduciary relations (property theory, trust theory, inequality theory, and others) and comprehensive theories of the emergence of fiduciary relations, such as the theory of powers and discretion, economic theory, have been analyzed. The research concludes that the purpose of fiduciary relationships is the delegation of beneficiary’s part of his / her / its legal capacity in favor of the fiduciary, resulting in the latter acquiring rights regarding the delegated powers. The use of delegated rights contrary to the purpose of the established legal relationship constitutes an abuse of right. Fiduciary duties are intended to prevent the fiduciary from abusing the rights transferred to him, and in the case of the breach, it becomes the basis for compensation of damages. From the perspective of economic theory, fiduciary duties reduce transaction costs, and this man explain the diversity of societal relationships in which fiduciary legal relations function.

References

Ухвала Касаційного цивільного суду у складі Верховного Суду від 14.04.2021 у справі № 585/2836/16-ц. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/96544695 (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Майданик Р. А. Проблеми регулювання довірчих відносин у цивільному праві : дис. … докт. юр. наук. Київ, 2003. 526 с.

Постанова Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду від 06.07.2022 у справі № 909/276/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105301090 (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Tamar Frankel. Fiduciary law. Oxford University Press, Inc., 2011. 313 с.

Deborah A. DeMott, Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation, 37 Duke Law Journal (1988). С. 879–924. URL: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article =1284&context=faculty_scholarship (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Paul B Miller. The Fiduciary relationship. Andrew S. Gold & Paul B. Miller, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). С. 63–90.

Irit Samet. Fiduciary Law as Equity’s Child. Paul B. Miller & Andrew S. Gold, eds., Contract, Status, and Fiduciary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). С. 139–166.

David Johnston. Fiduciary Principles in Roman Law. Criddle, Evan J. and Miller, Paul B. and Sitkoff, Robert H. The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. С. 505–523.

Richard H. Helmholz. Fiduciary Principles in the Canon Law. Criddle, Evan J. and Miller, Paul B. and Sitkoff, Robert H. The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. С. 491–504.

Mohammad Fadel. Fiduciary Principles in Classical Islamic Law Systems. Criddle, Evan J. and Miller, Paul B. and Sitkoff, Robert H. The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. С. 525–543.

Dana M. Muir. Fiduciary Principles in Pension Law. Criddle, Evan J. and Miller, Paul B. and Sitkoff, Robert H. The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. С. 167–186.

Про акціонерні товариства : Закон України від 17.09.2008 № 514-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/514-17#Text (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Про акціонерні товариства : Закон України від 27.07.2022 № 2465-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2465-20#Text (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Цивільний кодекс України : Закон України від 16.01.2003 № 435-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Постанова Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду від 20.10.2022 у справі № 910/3782/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107137332 (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Постанова Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду від 07.09.2022 у справі № 904/3867/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106304039 (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Henry E Smith. Why Fiduciary Law is Equitable. Andrew S. Gold & Paul B. Miller, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). С. 261–284.

Leonard I. Rotman. Fiduciary Doctrine: A Concept In A Need Of Understanding. Alberta Law Review. Volume 34-4. 1996. С. 821–852. URL: https://albertalawreview.com/index.php/ ALR/article/view/1074/1064 (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Julian Velasco. Delimiting fiduciary status. Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law. Edited by D. Gordon Smith and Andrew S. Gold. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018. С. 76–94.

Chapter 2. Property rights and the Coase Theorem. Thomas J. Miceli. Contemporary Issues in Law and Economics. Abingdon, Oxon [UK]; New York: Routledge, 2018. С. 6–12.

Robert H Sitkoff. An Economic Theory of Fiduciary Law. Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. (eds.) (2014). Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press UK. С. 197– 208.

А. С. Магдіч, Е. М. Лимонова. Асиметрія інформації: сфери виникнення та ефекти. Нобелівський вісник. 2019. № 1 (12). С. 50–56. URL: https://econforum.duan.edu.ua/images/ PDF/2019/8.pdf (дата звернення: 11.03.2024).

Цитування з Jack Beatson, “Public Law Influences in Contract Law,” in Jack Beatson and Daniel Friedmann (eds), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (1995) 263–88, 266–7 за Daniel Markovits. Sharing Ex Ante and Sharing Ex Post: The Non-Contractual Basis of Fiduciary Relations. Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. (eds.) (2014). Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press UK. С. 216.

Published

2024-05-01

Issue

Section

TOPICAL ISSUES OF PRIVATE LAW