HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51989/NUL.2022.3.30Keywords:
evolution, historical development, armed conflict, the concept of social transition, transitional justice, post-authoritarian politics, formation, social upheavals.Abstract
The article examines the features of the historical development of the concept of transitional justice in the theory of international law. The author draws attention to the urgency of the need to generalize the patterns of development of directions and mechanisms of transitional justice, study the evolution of international legal regulation of the transitional justice model, and clarify the impact of national contexts on the content of the transitional justice model. The author analyzes in detail the existing theories of the concept of transitional justice and draws attention to the common features of these concepts. In particular, this concerns the emergence of a transitional justice model through human rights campaigns around the world in response to serious violations of human rights or humanitarian law. The author concludes that transitional justice was formed as a model that directs political processes in the state to the stage of sustainable development. Moreover, it is proved that a characteristic feature of the history of the formation of individual mechanisms of transitional justice is their visualization without a vision of a holistic model (this applies to such areas as: amnesty, lustration, satisfaction). The author also concludes that in the process of evolution of the model of transitional justice two processes take place in parallel: the formation of the concept of transitional justice as a holistic model; formation of separate mechanisms and forms of settlement of post-conflict and post-authoritarian periods of state development. The article substantiates the inter-institutional nature of the model of transitional justice, which combines private law and public law institutions. This means that the model of transitional justice affects the whole spectrum of relations in a post-authoritarian and postconflict society.
References
Elster Jon. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. 2004. 106 р.
Reiter Andrew G. The development of transitional justice in Simić Olivera. An Introduction to Transitional Justice Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2017. Рр. 29–46.
Kritz Neil J. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Vol. 1. General Considerations. Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995. 804 р.
Базове дослідження із застосування правосуддя перехідного періоду в Україні : монографія / за заг. ред. А.П. Бущенка, М.М. Гнатовського. Київ : РУМЕС. 2017. 592 с.
Mihr Anja. An introduction to transitional justice in Simić. An Introduction to Transitional Justice Abingdon. Oxon : Routledge. 2017. Рр. 1–27.
Lang Olivia. Why Has Germany Taken So Long to Pay Off Its WWI Debt? BBC News (online). 02 October 2010. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11442892 (дата звернення: 13.06.2022).
Lachowski Tomasz. International Criminal Court-the Central Figure of Transitional Justice: Tailoring Post-Violence Strategies, with Special Reference to Ukraine. Polish Quarterly of International Affairs. Vol. 3. 2015. Рр. 39–58.
Engstrom Par. Transitional Justice and Ongoing Conflict in Sriram, Chandra Lekha. Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding on the Ground: Victims and Ex-Combatants. 2013. Рр. 41–61.
Huyse L. Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past. Law & Social Inquiry. 1995. Vol. 20. Pр. 51–78.
Skaar E. Truth Commissions, Trials – or Nothing? Human Rights in Democratic Transitions. Human Rights Research at the Chr. Michelsen Institute. 2005. Vol. 4. Pр. 149–171.
Pion-Berlin D. To Prosecute or to Pardon? Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone. Human Rights Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 16. Pр. 105–130.
Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice. 1st Edition / ed. by Naomi Roht-Arriaza, Javier Mariezcurrena. Cambridge University Press. 2006. 132 р.
Sandoval C. Transitional Justice: Key Concepts, Processes and Challenges. Villalba Institute for Democracy & Conflict Resolution. Briefi ng Paper (IDCR-BP-07/11). Part of the University of Essex Knowledge Gateway. 2011. 13 р.
Arthur P. How Transitions Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 31 (2). Pр. 321–367.
Bell C. Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the “Field” or “Non-Field”. International Journal of Transitional Justice. 2009. Vol. 3 (1). Pр. 5–27.
Cassel D. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Victims Unsilenced: The Inter- American Human Rights System and Transitional Justice in Latin America. Washington DC : Due Process of Law Foundation. 2007. Pр. 151–167.
Хлабистова К.В. Еволюція поняття люстрації з часів античності до ХХ століття. Науковий вісник НАВС. 2016. № 2 (99). С. 315–325.
Приходько І. Генезис інституту амністії в праві. Національний юридичний журнал: теорія і практика. 2017. № 18. С. 100–103.
Мезох М.М. Международно-правовая ответственность государств за действия индивидов. Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2012. № 3–2. С. 121–123.
Richard B. McCaslin Reconstructing a Frontier Oligarchy: Andrew Johnson’s Amnesty Proclamation and Arkansas. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 49. No. 4. Рр. 313–329.
Jo-Marie. Burt Transitional Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict: Lessons from Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador. US: Due Process of Law Foundation. 2018. 139 р.